Warth v. Seldin Case Brief
Summary of Warth v. Seldin S. Ct. (1975) Relevant Facts: Petitioners were comprised of various individuals wanting the rezoning of an area within the confines of the City of Penfield NY. Penfield is and exclusive area
Summary of Warth v. Seldin S. Ct. (1975) Relevant Facts: Petitioners were comprised of various individuals wanting the rezoning of an area within the confines of the City of Penfield NY. Penfield is and exclusive area
-8″?> faultCode
Summary of Schneider v. Irvington Facts: Ordinances prohibiting leafleting on public streets. Issue: Can cities totally ban the right to leaflet in public areas? Holding: No, cities can’t totally ban the right to leaflet. Reasoning: Public streets are to be used by
-8″?> faultCode
-8″?> faultCode
Summary of San Antonio Ind. School Dist. v. Rodriguez Facts: State legislature established a program in which 80% of a school’s funding comes from the state and the other 20% is based on local property taxes.
-8″?> faultCode
-8″?> faultCode
Summary of Roth v. United States and Alberts v. California 354 U.S. 476, 77 S.Ct. 1304 (1957) Facts: Samuel Roth was charged with violating a federal statute making it a crime to send pornographic or obscene