King v. Commonwealth Case Brief
Summary of King v. Commonwealth, Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1988
Facts: King (D) and a co-pilot Bailey were transporting 500 pounds of marijuana in a plane. The plane was flying through mountains and suddenly it encountered fog. The plane crashed into a mountain, killing Bailey. D survived the crash.
Procedure: D was charged with felony-murder of Bailey based on the felony possession of marijuana.
Issue: Did the trial ct. err by applying the felony-murder rule to this case?
Holding: Ye
Rule: In order to apply the felony-murder rule, “death must be a consequence of felony…and not merely coincidence.”
Rationale:No causal connection exists between the felony of drug distribution and the killing by a plane crash. The crash of the plane was not directly a result of a act furthering the felony. Just because the plane crashed at the time D was committing a felony does not mean that the crash was the result of this felony. If D had been flying the plane really low to the ground in order to avoid radar protection, then the felony-murder rule could have applied. But such facts are not available in this case.